Not Again! Are More Swazi Elephants Heading for US Zoos?

October 8th, 2015

Dear Friends of Wildlife

It is like a nightmare repeating itself!

Back in 2003, and despite strenuous efforts by Born Free and others to prevent it, the Kingdom of Swaziland sold eleven of its elephant herd to two zoos in the USA.  The declared reason? Over-population.  At the time, Swaziland had a population of less than 40 elephants, many of whom had originated as orphans from South Africa , following a culling programme in Kruger National Park.

I remember well, as we argued in court for the importation to be denied, hearing the authorities in Swaziland declare that if the animals were not taken by the two US zoos “refrigerator space had been reserved for their bodies”.

The judge folded under such intense emotional pressure.

So, you would have thought that, subsequently, the Swazi authorities would have carefully worked out just how many elephants could be supported in the tiny country and its National Parks and then carefully managed their population through birth control to ensure that numbers were stable.

However, now Swaziland is preparing to ship a further 18 elephants (from its national herd which still stands at less than 40 animals) to the Dallas Zoo in Texas, Sedgwick County Zoo in Kansas, and Henry Doorly Zoo in Nebraska, for an undisclosed sum and a promise of a million dollars for black rhino conservation in Swaziland.

First the proposed shipment must be approved by the US Fish & Wildlife Service but I understand that zoo officials anticipate that the agency will approve the application within the next month or so.

The Parks Authorities in Swaziland claim that the elephants are degrading their environment and that supplementary feed, in the form of hay, has had to be brought in from South Africa. The situation is exacerbated by a severe drought.

Apparently they also claim that there is no option but to ship the animals out and that there are no suitable places for them to be relocated to in Africa.  Can that possibly be true?  Can it be that there are no private reserves in the whole of Southern Africa that could take these animals and thereby allow them to live as wild a life as possible in their natural habitat?

The zoos must be praying the import is approved since the captive African elephant population held in US zoos is currently in terminal decline due to low breeding rates and compromised longevity – basically more elephants are dying than are being born.  Without an injection of ‘new blood’ with breeding potential, experts predict that the US captive elephant population will cease to exist within the next few decades.

The zoos are seeking to represent this import as a ‘rescue’ and are critical of those who are opposed.  According to Gregg Hudson, President and CEO of the Dallas Zoo, “Some people would rather see these elephants die than live in an accredited zoo”.  I strongly disagree. I would rather see these elephants live in the wild – where they belong!

With my sceptical hat on, I suspect that another reason for the zoos’ desire to import elephants is not only to bolster their dysfunctional captive breeding programmes but to populate new, expensive and yet meagre facilities.  The new $75m African Grassland Project at the Henry Doorly Zoo features a 4.5 acre elephant facility costing about US$15m; the Dallas Zoo’s Wilds of Africa confines its elephants to about 4.2 acres; while Zambezi River Valley at the Sedgwick County Zoo covers 5 acres at a cost of $10.6m (and features a boat ride…). These costly facilities don’t even begin to compare to the range of a wild elephant family which can extend to hundreds of thousands of acres.

This is wrong on so many levels.  The decision of Swaziland to have elephants in the first place; their decision to export elephants again; the involvement of American zoos in this transaction; the compromised lives that these animals will now endure, thousands of miles away from their natural habitat; the ostentatious levels of zoo expenditure on tiny postage-stamp sized “habitats” (with grandiose names) which consume tens of millions of dollars, money that elephant conservation in the wild is crying out for……..

You can probably tell I am outraged by this news and I can only hope that the US authorities see the bigger picture and recognise that this really is not good for elephants.  Quite the opposite.

Blogging off!


Will Travers | 4 Comments »


September 29th, 2015

The announcement of London Zoo’s latest project has got us thinking!

Here, my friend and colleague, Anna Wade, reviews the zoo’s plans to take visitors ‘on safari’. See what you think!

Blogging off!


“The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) has recently announced plans to build a “safari camp” next to the new Asiatic lion enclosure at London Zoo. The zoo has received planning permission to build nine cabins for visitors to stay overnight, on the perimeter of the new enclosure, which is set to open to the public in 2016. Let’s take a closer look at these new plans:

ZSL has stated that the cost of building the enclosure will be £5,200,000. I’ll repeat that: £5,200,000. Surely this sum would be better spent on efforts to save wild lion populations in India? According to the ZSL annual report, the Society’s entire annual spend on conservation programmes in 2014 was £6,030,000. In other words, the equivalent of 86% of ZSL’s annual spend on conservation programmes has been spent on an enclosure currently set to house three female Asiatic lions.

At that cost, the enclosure must surely be a reasonable size, right? Well, at 2,500sqm (0.6 acres), maybe not. Plans for the nine cabins indicate that each will be 167sqm, covering a total of 1503sqm (0.4 acres) with further space allocated for a communal garden. It is a sad irony that the visitors, who get to stay a night or two at the zoo, may end up having more space than the animals who will spend their entire lives there.

This is not the first time London Zoo has offered visitors the opportunity to stay after hours.  Last year, “Zoo Lates” (now re-branded as “Sunset Safaris”) received significant criticism after reports surfaced of inappropriate behaviour from visitors, which led to questions over the zoo’s ability to safeguard animal welfare.

London Zoo correctly states that the wild population of Asiatic lions is in peril. However, with the chances of release to the wild for these animals or their progeny being virtually zero, protection of the remaining wild Asiatic lion population is paramount to the continued survival of this species in its natural habitat: in my view, keeping lions at London Zoo will not ensure this outcome. Furthermore, some might regard the construction of visitor accommodation in the zoo is little more than a gimmick at the expense of much needed larger enclosures for the animals and the application of resources towards keeping Asiatic lions in the wild – where they belong.

ZSL trustee report can be found at:

Will Travers | 1 Comment »

Speaking up for Animals

September 14th, 2015

Dear Friends of Wildlife

I am often sent letters and emails and Tweets from people asking why animals are treated the way they are.  And today I echo those many letters by asking the same simple question: WHY?

Why are hundreds of elephants killed each year as trophies?

Why were 442 hippo trophies imported into the US between 2012 and 2013, as well as 758 leopard trophies?

Why were a third of the wild wolves of Montana shot (230) in 2013?

Why were 180 wolves trapped in Wisconsin?

Why would anybody want to pay US$1,000 to shoot a giraffe or US$4,000 to kill a crocodile?

Why are there only 20,000 rhino left on the planet?

Why are there as few as 20,000 wild lions in Africa?

Why in the UK is it permissible to cull thousands of badgers in a deeply misguided effort to control bovine tuberculosis, when the killers have missed every target; the methodology is fundamentally flawed; the process fails to meet declared standards of humaneness; when it costs £7,000 to kill each badger; when genuine alternatives, such as vaccination, exist; and when the deaths of these badgers will not achieve the outcome we want to see – a consistent, long-term and significant reduction in bovine TB.

I simply don’t know the answer to all these whys…… but I do know why, together, we will continue, with Born Free and other groups around the world, to champion the cause of wildlife and seek an end to cruelty, suffering, persecution and exploitation. Because if we don’t, who will.

Blogging off


Will Travers | 2 Comments »


September 4th, 2015

Dear Friends of Wildlife,

So the Taiji dolphin slaughter has been ‘postponed’ due to bad weather. May the bad weather continue forever if that is the case!

Just how long can the Japanese authorities tolerate this sickening event which draws such widespread international condemnation from around the world?

Marches, rallies, petitions, documentaries, news articles…. The sheer volume of material expressing the outrage and frustration of tens of millions from almost every country – including Japan itself – must surely prevail one day.

But how can we bring about an end the Taiji as quickly as possible? Well stop going to captive dolphin shows would be one way. Evidence seems to make it clear that it is the live sale of dolphins for exploitation in dolphinaria, both in Japan and further afield, that generates the big money which pays for the annual scenes of brutality and bloody carnage.

The UK has no captive dolphins shows. The last one closed in the early 1990s and three of the last dolphins were released into the wild as part of the Into The Blue project which Born Free helped fund and coordinate.  But dolphin shows with their loud music, inane acts, concrete pools, chlorinated water and lifetime confinement are still a feature in Europe, North America, the Middle East, China and the Far East. These facilities survive simply because ill-informed people pay good money to watch these intelligent, social animals ‘perform’.

So, as I say, please don’t go. Don’t sustain a form of exploitation that has totally lost all credibility, perpetuates suffering and may rely on the Taiji bloodbath for its victims.

And if the powers that be can arrange to deliver stormy weather for the next two years or more, then the hunting will stop and maybe, just maybe, the Taiji dolphins can live wild and free – as nature intended.

Blogging off!


Will Travers | Comments Off

A Message from Kenya

August 27th, 2015

Dear Friends of Wildlife

I was 38,000 feet above the earth on a Kenya Airways Dreamliner, on the anniversary of George Adamson’s murder, 26 years ago.  I was flying to Kenya and it seemed incredibly appropriate.  I was to join the Born Free team and our colleagues at Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) in Meru National Park, to the north-east of Mount Kenya, the very area where George and his wife Joy, returned Elsa to the wild.  It truly is the home of Born Free. Elsa is buried there, under a tree near the river.  I was flying out to help the Born Free and KWS teams with a Land Rover sponsored effort to count lions.  I think George and Joy would have approved.

Lion numbers across Africa have tumbled by more than 50% in the last 30 years. Some suggest that as few as 20,000 now survive across the entire Continent. However, in Kenya, there may be 2,000 or so individuals and there is still a very strong possibility that with effective conservation measures, wild lions will still roam Kenya’s National Parks and Reserves long into the future.  But in order for us to understand the pressures on lions and to mitigate conflict with local communities and livestock, for example, we need to know how many lions there are and measure our success (or failure) based on real numbers.

I won’t go into all the details of what we saw or what we did because this will be revealed, I hope, later in the year in a short film that Chris Scott and I made on this trip.  However, I can tell you that on Night 1 we saw three lions; on Night 2, we saw a solitary lioness and, in the glorious, golden evening light on Night 3, we saw four adult females resting on an ant-hill as the sun dipped below the horizon.  Could they have been the descendants of some of the lions that featured in the film Born Free - Girl, Boy and Ugas?  Impossible to say, but I would like to think so.  Again, I think George and Joy would have approved.

Mum summed it up very well when she wrote on our website recently I wish everyone who cares about animals could have met him (George) as he was someone who opened his arms to all individuals, people and animals and – from my knowledge of him – was without prejudice and, in spite of his strongly held views, was a man of great tolerance, humility, understanding.  And humour.

My memory of sitting in camp with George and Bill at the end of the day – sometimes talking, sometimes just sharing the silence, sometimes watching a lion or two contentedly lying outside the camp fence – is one I shall never forget.

We must always remember him, cherish his memory, try and follow his example and follow our hearts as he did, keep alive his deep respect for the individual.

I know I will.”

We will never be able to live-up to his example in full, but if we try then, together, we can help ensure that lions, the symbol of Africa in so many ways, remain wild and free.

That is George’s legacy.

Blogging off


Will Travers | 1 Comment »

SeaWorld’s Profits Flop like the Drooping Dorsal Fins of Captive Orca

August 13th, 2015

Some predicted that the impact of the ‘Blackfish Effect’ would soon pass, but it seems that public disaffection with SeaWorld continues and is beginning to really bite where it hurts – the bottom line.

The company’s latest Financial Report, released on the 6th August, reveals that net income in the second quarter dropped from $37.4m in 2014 to $5.8m in 2015, a staggering decline of 84%.

It seems the troubled captive animal entertainment company just can’t shake off the bad news:

  • Attendance is down by more than 100,000 compared to last year.
  • SeaWorld shares have lost more than half of their market value on Wall Street since the 2013 release of the film Blackfish.

Announcing dismal half year results, SeaWorld CEO, Joel Manby, was forced to admit that the company is still struggling to convince the public that it treats its whales well. He did, however, sketch out SeaWorld’s vision of the future, with further details to be announced at an event on 6 November 2015.

Known future SeaWorld projects include plans for a new captive shark exhibition in SeaWorld Orlando, a “naturalistic”, captive swim-with-dolphin experience at SeaWorld San Antonio and, of course, the Blue World project, which seeks to increase the size of the orca tanks at SeaWorld San Diego.

Despite these plans, The Born Free Foundation is adamant that orca, as well as all dolphin and whale species, do not fare well in captivity and, no matter the size of the tank, captive public display facilities are not appropriate environments for these animals.

SeaWorld may continue to try and persuade the public that they can successfully keep orca in captivity but you only need to compare the vast difference in the space and complexity of the natural marine environment with existing or proposed captive facilities to conclude that SeaWorld have not fully understood the reason millions of people increasingly object to the continued exploitation of sentient, socially complex, highly intelligent species for entertainment and commercial gain. Bigger tanks are not the answer!

I believe that SeaWorld must either take this opportunity to fundamentally rethink its priorities and align its vision with the public’s desire to support the protection and conservation of wild, free-living marine species – or it will continue to sink like a stone.

Either way, the Blackfish Effect will triumph.

Blogging off


Will Travers | 7 Comments »

On Cecil: The African Lion is Endangered. What is the Government Waiting For?

August 3rd, 2015

Guest Blog from Adam Roberts CEO Born Free

The very symbol of wild Africa is under threat. Lions are in the firing line. This week’s powerful Guest Blog is from my friend and colleague, Adam Roberts, CEO of Born Free. This really nails it!

Blogging off, Will

2nd August 2015

‘I don’t recall the last time I saw/read/heard such global outrage at the killing of one animal. I’ll take it. We need all the help we can get calling attention to the plight of wildlife across the globe.

The killing of Cecil, a proud lion of Zimbabwe, is a tragedy. A pathetic, selfish killer stalked him (with paid help), allegedly lured him from a protected area (as though geography would have stopped the slaughter), and shot him with the arrow of a crossbow (shot, not killed, because this hunter, while called a crack shot, couldn’t even kill a lion who neither feared nor threatened humans)—and Cecil suffered for 40 hours before a rifle bullet took him from this world. Massive anger at this atrocity is well-founded.

But, let’s please all be very clear; there is a scenario in which no one is talking about the killing of Cecil. In March 2011, Born Free USA and others petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the African lion as “endangered” under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. If approved, lion “trophies” could only be imported into America with a special permit that would be granted if the applicant could prove that killing that lion would enhance the survival of the species. (It happens, but it is not standard.)

For four years, we’ve waited. Well, what is the government waiting for?

The African lion is estimated to live on a fragmented 8% of its historic habitat across Africa. The African lion is estimated to have suffered population decline of more than 50% since 1980, falling from some 75,000 animals to somewhere around 30,000. Is this not an animal in danger? The African lion could go extinct in my lifetime.

The African lion is endangered. What is the government waiting for?

The African lion has not only lost its habitat, but as it loses habitat, it loses access to prey and is forced to feed on livestock. This results in retaliatory killing by livestock owners by the spear and by horrific poisoning. The African lion succumbs to disease. The African lion is killed in countries like Nigeria for its organs, fat, tissue, blood, and its body parts to be used in traditional medicines. And, hundreds of African lions are killed every single year by trophy hunters—more than half of whom, I’m ashamed to say, come from America.

The African lion is under perpetual assault throughout its range. What is the government waiting for?

What makes me angriest is that we know this happens. We said it. We shouted it from the rooftops. Lions are endangered; they need help!

So, what’s the problem? Do loss of habitat, serious population declines, and massive threats not support providing this incredibly beleaguered species protection?

Ah, there are other stakeholders’ opinions to consider… The Safari Club, the National Rifle Association (NRA), and the “wise users,” all of whom think wild animals should pay their way; who think they are the true conservationists; who have all the answers; who once called me a Banana Republic conservationist because I go on humane, non-consumptive wildlife safaris, devoid of their wasteful thrill-killing.

I have written this line so many times… We, in the animal protection movement, are so often called “chicken little”: running around, crying that the sky is falling, every time we want to protect animals from cruelty, suffering, abuse, threats, and extinction.

Well, the time for change is now: in the name of Cecil and every other animal subject to cruel, unjustifiable exploitation.

Give animals and their advocates the benefit of the doubt. Stop waiting. Stop this insane allegiance and deference to the hunters of the world. Stop calling us emotional and unscientific.

Had the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the African lion as “endangered” three, even two, years ago, perhaps Cecil wouldn’t have suffered and died. Perhaps the lion would have been protected from the American wealthy hunting elite and they would have had to spend their money and satisfy their blood lust in some other way.

It’s time for change. It’s time to stop making us wait. When we scream from the rooftops that lions are endangered, that the ivory trade is out of control, that rhinos are being poached to extinction, that pangolins are being traded to death, that furbearers are suffering miserably in steel jaw traps, that elephants don’t belong in zoos and orcas don’t belong in cement tanks, that primates don’t make good pets, and that people shouldn’t have the opportunity to pet a tiger for a photo… Maybe, just maybe, U.S. government decision-makers should listen to our voices over the self-interested, self-justifying wildlife traders, or the hunting and captivity and pet and trapping industry apologists.

More than 500 Cecils are inexplicably slaughtered every year… for fun.

This isn’t an “I told you so” blog. I don’t want to be right; I want to get it right. And, until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service acts to protect the lion… Well, they’ve got it wrong.

Cecil didn’t have to die. Will we act before it happens again?

Keep Wildlife in the Wild,


Will Travers | 3 Comments »

There’s Real Time, Greenwich Mean Time – and then there’s the dreaded ‘Parliamentary Time’!

July 23rd, 2015

Will the long-awaited ban on the use of wild animals circuses in England fall victim, once more, to “lack of Parliamentary time”? In this guest blog, my friend and colleague, Liz Tyson, explains.

Back in 2012, the then Defra Minister announced that the use of wild animals in travelling circuses in England would be banned “as soon as parliamentary time allows”. The news was met with delight. Surely this popular measure, with massive, cross-party political support, would breeze through the parliamentary process.

Indeed, some senior parliamentarians predicted that it could pass through both the House of Commons and the House of Lords in a matter of days.

It is now July 2015 and wild animals still perform in the big top. Not only has the process stalled but history appears to be repeating itself. Like a scene from Groundhog Day, the current Minister repeats the mantra of his predecessor: that the ban will be introduced “as soon as parliamentary time allows”.

The current delay is certainly not for lack of trying! Since the intention to ban was announced, there have been at least 29 Parliamentary Questions on the subject; we have been told in our regular meetings with MPs that this issue continues to feature heavily in their mailbag; and we know the ongoing plight of wild animals in circuses remains of grave concern to both the public and MPs alike. Yet the ban still remains elusive and the exploitation endures.

Two years ago, trying to remain positive, Born Free, the RSPCA and our partners accepted the Government’s reassurances that their controversial licensing regime, introduced in January 2013, was ‘temporary’, designed to simply ‘fill the gap’ until it would be replaced by the ban “just as soon as parliamentary time allows”.

However, it all depends what you mean by temporary. Ominously, in a recent answer to a question posed by Louise Haigh MP, the Minister suggested that the temporary licensing regime may still be in place for years to come. He went on to say that: “a full evaluation of the licensing scheme will be carried out, if required, as part of the statutory five year review”. The regime’s five year review will be due in 2018. The government has promised that the ban would be in place long before then, no later than the end of 2015. What is going on?

After 20 years campaigning on this issue, can it really be the case that the last three years have not offered even the smallest parliamentary opportunity to do the right thing for wild animals still being used in travelling circuses?

The government may be slow to act – but our response can be immediate.

Please contact the Prime Minister, David Cameron MP, and ask him to deliver on his personal commitment to ‘get it done’, to honour the the Government’s election manifesto pledge, and to keep faith with the great majority of people across the nation. It is time to finally bring the curtain down.

The time to ban is now.”

I could not have put it better myself!

Blogging off


Will Travers | 42 Comments »

Preserve the Hunting Act intact

July 13th, 2015

***Good news update – Will attended a march in London this morning where the assembled protestors learned the news that the amendment had been withdrawn (for now at least). Many thanks to everyone who contacted their MPs on this issue***

Mahatma Gandhi once said that “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”

When the Hunting Act was passed in 2004, I and many others rejoiced.  It was not perfect but it addressed one fundamental principle, namely that we would no longer tolerate the pursuit of animals with a pack of hounds until their violent death for ‘fun’.

Of course, the Act still permitted the killing of various species for a number of reasons (the dispatch of injured animals, ‘pest control’ and more) but, in my view,  it rightly ended the grotesque concept that we should derive pleasure from so doing.

The proposed Amendments to the Statutory Instruments which govern the implementation of the Hunting Act, due to be debated in the House of Commons on 15th July, represent the start of a fundamental erosion to the principles underpinning the Hunting Act which may well lead, once more, to the pursuit and killing of foxes and other animals by a pack of hounds for ‘sport’.

Proponents of the Amendments claim that they bring legislation in England into line with legislation in Scotland.  I do not believe this to be the case.  Having looked at both, I conclude that the proposals for England will result in even weaker legislative provisions than currently exists in Scotland.

As I write, it is unclear to me whether the short 90 minute debate which will take place this coming Wednesday, the 15th July, will conclude with a ‘free vote’ allowing MPs to vote as their conscience dictates or whether it will be ‘whipped’.  I hope and expect that the Prime Minister’s previous commitment to a free vote will still stand.

MPs of all Parties can then search their consciousness; reflect upon the overwhelming view of the urban and rural public which is fundamentally against the hunting of foxes for sport; take into account the compelling evidence provided by organisations such as the RSPCA, The League Against Cruel Sports, Team Fox ( IFAW and others, which demonstrates that, despite the introduction of the Hunting Act in 2004,  fox populations have stabilized, not exploded out of control, and that hunting with hounds does not provide an effective or acceptable way of managing foxes; and reflect further on our hard-won national reputation as a compassionate nation. Having taken all this into account, I then hope they  do the right thing.

For all these reasons and more, I hope our elected representatives reject the proposed Amendments and preserve the Hunting Act intact.

Blogging off


STOP PRESS: Scottish National Party MPs have announced that they will vote against Wednesday’s motion to amend the Hunting Act. Many thanks to all those who contacted their Scottish MPs asking them to do so; if your MP is an SNP Member you no longer need to contact them on this issue. However if your MP belongs to another Party, do please contact him or her urging them to vote against Wednesday’s motion.

Will Travers | 1 Comment »

Big Cat Week

July 8th, 2015

Dear Friends of Wildlife,

This week it is all about lions!

Lions in a circus in Wales. Yes, as Scotland and England move inexorably towards a ban on the use of wild animals in circuses, Mr Chipperfield has decided to test the public mood by setting up for ten days in Powys with tigers and lions.  According to my sources, a grand total of 22 people turned up for the performance in Friday 3rd July at 6.30 pm in Welshpool.

Let’s be clear.  In the public consultation carried out by Defra, 94.5% of people who responded called for an end to this form of animal exploitation.  In a similar exercise just completed in Scotland, 98% called for it to come to an end.  The Welsh Government is inclined to end it as well, once the Westminster Parliament  passes the necessary legislation which we hope will  be by the end of the year, according to Defra Minister, George Eustice.

This really is, in my view, the last roll of the dice but what will happen to the animals?  I know that Born Free and the RSPCA have offered to assist in finding suitable homes where they could be retired with dignity – but will that be what Mr Chipperfield has in mind or will he take his act to Europe where circuses are still, sadly, common place?  Our offer is on the table.

Lions in Bulgaria. Born Free is in the process of preparing to move two former circus lions from Bulgaria to Shamwari in South Africa.  Of course, lots of planning is now underway and there are mountains of paperwork to be done but I hope that later this year two more lions will find sanctuary in Shamwari and live out the rest of their lives under the African sun.

Find out how you can help here.

And some people want to look at lions down the barrel of a gun!

A new film, Blood Lions, is out shortly and you can be amongst the first to get a glimpse of what this extraordinary documentary has uncovered here and .

It seems barely credible that the South African government permits people to shoot a lion that has been raised in captivity and that may have been released into a large enclosure just a few days before on what is, in effect, a ‘no kill, no fee’ basis.  The lion cannot escape.  Its death is guaranteed – where is the sport in that?

I hope that Blood Lions will have the same global impact as Blackfish and cause a change in policy in South Africa and a change in attitude everywhere else.  This is not the 21st Century we wish to see.

My good friend and Born Free supporter, Peter Andre, has just returned from Kenya where he has been witnessing some of our work including building a Predator Proof Boma in Amboseli National Park designed to protect local communities and their livestock from night-time predation and to eliminate the possibility of retaliation killing which are all too often the result of livestock predation.

Here’s a link to Peter’s adventure and a big thank you to the Born Free team, Land Rover, Kenya Airways and Serena Hotels who hosted him.  And a big ‘Thank you’ to Peter who has been a consistent public voice of compassion for many years.

And you have the purrrfect opportunity to help big cats (and all wildlife) by taking part in Born Free’s Big cat Nap [LINK] where you can ‘Do Nothing For Charity’ in aid of wild animals in need! Wow!

There you are – a veritable ‘pride’ of lion issues for you to get your teeth into. Off you go!

Blogging off.


Will Travers | 6 Comments »